Contested projects resolved with jurisdictional control, capital protection, and disciplined enforcement.
Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution: Control Over High-Value Project Risk
Handle structures and executes infrastructure and construction litigation and dispute resolution as a single, integrated mandate: contract to claim, dispute to enforcement, project to balance sheet. We align EPC, FIDIC, PPP, and concession frameworks with court and arbitration strategy to secure enforceable outcomes in the UAE and across key cross-border forums.
From contractor and employer disputes to delay, variation, defects, termination, and payment stand-offs, we move from claims architecture to hearings to enforcement with institutional discipline. Law aligned with project reality. Capital ring-fenced. Timelines controlled.
Our Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution Services: Built for Enforceable Project Outcomes
Handle leads high-stakes construction and infrastructure disputes across UAE courts and international arbitration, designed for capital protection, continuity of delivery, and enforceable results. We connect technical project detail with legal, financial, and regulatory leverage in one execution model.
UAE Courts & Construction Litigation
Representation in UAE Federal, Local, DIFC, and ADGM courts; pleadings, evidence, and enforcement aligned to project economics.
Construction Arbitration & ADR
DIAC, ICC, LCIA, ADGM, and ad hoc construction arbitration; from case theory to award and cross-border recognition.
Claims, Variations & Delay Disputes
Structuring and prosecuting entitlement, delay, disruption, and variation claims with quantum and delay analysis embedded.
Project Termination, Defects & Asset Recovery
Termination, defects liability disputes, bond calls, guarantees, and asset recovery engineered around security and enforcement.
Why Work with an Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution Expert
Infrastructure and construction disputes sit at the intersection of law, engineering, and capital. Handle leads mandates where program disruption, cost escalation, and contractor failure test governance, financing, and reputation in the UAE and beyond.
Our model connects contract risk, technical evidence, and financial exposure into one strategy. We structure the dispute around enforceability and capital recovery, not just legal argument.
- Deep experience across EPC, FIDIC, PPP, concessions, and major project frameworks
- UAE and offshore forum capability: Federal, Local, DIFC, ADGM, DIAC, ICC, LCIA
- Integrated quantum, delay, and technical expert management
- Execution aligned with lenders, investors, and sovereign-linked stakeholders
- Interim relief and asset preservation where performance or solvency is stressed
- Mandates structured around enforceable outcomes and balance sheet impact
Better Ask Handle
Why Choose Us to Handle Your Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution
High-value projects demand more than sector familiarity; they demand control over forum, evidence, and enforcement. We operate inside the institutional realities of sponsors, lenders, contractors, and regulators, not at the margins.
Handle integrates legal strategy, capital exposure, and project governance into one execution plan; securing outcomes that withstand scrutiny from boards, credit committees, and public stakeholders.
EnquireProject-Centric Case Architecture
We build disputes around programme, cash flow, and security structures; every pleading aligned to project economics and enforcement routes.
Forum & Jurisdictional Control
We engineer forum, governing law, and enforcement paths to align with where assets, counterparties, and decision-makers can be compelled.
Technical Evidence Integrated Early
Quantum, delay, and engineering experts are embedded from the outset; no disconnect between site reality and tribunal narrative.
Capital & Stakeholder Alignment
Strategy structured around lenders, investors, sponsors, and regulators; outcomes that preserve funding lines and governance stability.
Anchored in the Region’s Most Strategic Hubs
We work across the UAE’s leading financial centers, free zones, regulatory authorities, and courts; giving our clients certainty in both capital and law.
When your business turns legal, capital turns critical, and legacy turns strategic… #BetterAskHandle
What’s Included in Our Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution Services
We execute end-to-end infrastructure and construction dispute mandates with disciplined case theory, technical evidence control, and enforcement-focused strategy across UAE and international forums.
Every step is anchored in project economics, security packages, and capital exposure; converting claims and awards into practical, enforceable results.
- Contract and claim review across EPC, FIDIC, PPP, and concession structures
- Forum and jurisdiction strategy: UAE Federal, Local, DIFC, ADGM, and arbitration
- Case development: pleadings, evidence bundles, witness and expert management
- Delay, disruption, and quantum claim preparation with specialist input
- Interim measures: performance bond disputes, freezing orders, and asset preservation
- Enforcement and asset recovery on judgments, awards, and security instruments
“Before offering your business for M&A, you must raise it with discipline. Strengthen governance, restore financial clarity, and sharpen strategy. A parented business attracts investors with confidence, not discounts.”
Mohamed abu El-MakaremManaging Partner & Chairman
“Good litigation is disciplined project management. Clear filings, clean evidence, and a hearing plan that your board understands. That is how outcomes travel from courtroom to cash.”
Hamda Al FalasiPartner, Law & Arbitration
The Powerhouse of Law & Capital⚬
The Powerhouse of Law & Capital⚬
The Powerhouse of Law & Capital⚬
The Powerhouse of Law & Capital⚬
The Powerhouse of Law & Capital⚬
#BetterAskHandle⚬
#BetterAskHandle⚬
#BetterAskHandle⚬
#BetterAskHandle⚬
#BetterAskHandle⚬
Frequently Asked Infrastructure & Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution Questions
Handle leads infrastructure and construction disputes for sponsors, contractors, lenders, and public-linked entities operating through the UAE, structured for forum control, capital protection, and enforceable outcomes.
When should an infrastructure or construction dispute move from negotiation to formal litigation or arbitration?
The inflection point is when project risk, capital exposure, or security can no longer be contained by commercial negotiation. We move to formal proceedings when contractual timelines, limitation periods, or bond and guarantee positions require enforceable action. The test is simple: if delay compromises entitlement or recoverability, proceedings are triggered. We then lock jurisdiction, evidence, and interim protection in a single move.
How do you approach disputes under FIDIC or similar standard forms in the UAE?
We treat FIDIC and similar forms as engineered risk matrices, not templates. Our teams align claim notices, determinations, and DAB/DAAB processes with UAE court or arbitration strategy from the outset. We structure compliance with contractual mechanisms to preserve rights while positioning for the most effective forum. The objective is enforceable entitlement, not procedural argument.
What forums do you use for major construction disputes involving UAE projects?
We operate across UAE Federal and Local courts, DIFC and ADGM courts, and arbitration centers including DIAC, ICC, LCIA, and ADGM. Forum selection is driven by contract wording, counterparty profile, asset location, and enforcement efficiency. Where appropriate, we leverage offshore courts linked to onshore enforcement to secure advantage. Jurisdiction is treated as a strategic asset, not a given.
How do you handle performance bond and guarantee disputes during project distress?
We move immediately to assess call risk, governing law, and issuing bank or surety exposure. Where unjustified calls or calls in bad faith arise, we pursue injunctions or urgent relief in the appropriate court to preserve position. Parallel to relief, we structure negotiations and security reconfigurations to stabilise the project or crystallise recovery. The bond is treated as leverage to be controlled, not a contingency to be observed.
What role do delay and quantum experts play in your construction dispute strategy?
Delay and quantum experts sit inside the case architecture from the start, not as late-stage additions. We align programming, critical path, and valuation analyses directly with pleadings and witness testimony. This integration allows tribunals and courts to see a coherent factual and technical narrative. The result is evidential strength that holds under cross-examination and judicial scrutiny.
How do you balance ongoing project delivery with aggressive dispute action?
We define the client’s project objective first: continuation, controlled exit, or recovery. Strategy then separates operational dialogue from formal dispute channels, keeping site progress insulated from necessary legal escalation where possible. We structure standstill arrangements, partial settlements, or milestone-based accommodations when they preserve overall leverage. Litigation or arbitration proceeds on a track that protects, rather than destabilises, project outcomes.
Can you enforce foreign arbitration awards or judgments related to construction projects in the UAE?
Yes, subject to treaty frameworks, UAE law, and procedural compliance. We map enforcement routes through onshore UAE courts, DIFC and ADGM as conduit jurisdictions, and reciprocal recognition frameworks. The strategy is engineered to reach assets quickly and with minimal procedural friction. Award drafting and seat selection are managed with enforcement in mind from the outset, not after the fact.
How do you work with lenders and investors during major project disputes?
We treat lenders and investors as central stakeholders, not observers. Our mandates typically align litigation and arbitration strategy with covenants, security packages, and step-in or enforcement rights. We brief credit and investment committees on risk, timeline, and recovery scenarios using their language. Dispute actions are then calibrated to protect capital structure and preserve future financing options.
What types of infrastructure and construction projects do you typically handle?
We act across transport, energy, utilities, social infrastructure, industrial facilities, and complex real estate schemes. The common denominator is scale, multi-party contracting, and capital structures involving banks, funds, or sovereign-related entities. Whether greenfield or brownfield, EPC or PPP, we structure the dispute around project finance and governance realities. Complexity is an operational parameter, not a constraint.
When should we engage Handle on a potential construction dispute?
Engagement is triggered when you see material deviation from programme, payment, or performance that threatens entitlement, security, or financing. That may be early warning notices, entrenched variation disputes, or signs of contractor or employer distress. Early involvement allows us to align notices, evidence, and forum positioning before positions harden. When project risk becomes legal risk, Handle leads the response.
Our Insights.
Partner-led perspectives on law, capital, and strategy, shaped by live mandates and boardroom realities.
Insights
Partner with Handle
Have a question or challenge? Reach out for tailored advice on law, capital, or strategy. Our experts respond promptly with clarity and solutions suited to your ambitions.

















